Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +898%
1.428 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
RV630
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy