Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +107%
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
GP108B
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy