Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (135W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100 +692%
3.297 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1792
Shading Units
128
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
135W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
G92
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy