Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +10141%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT218
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy