Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 236W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +92%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
800
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
236W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GT200
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy