Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9370 vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD FireStream 9370 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370 +108%
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Aug 2012
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
12
1600
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy