Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2245MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900 GRE +117797%
45.98 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Jul 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1287 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2245 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
80
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
160
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
359.2 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
718.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.96 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.98 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1437 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 31
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XL (215-145000206)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy