Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon X1600

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon X1600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
16 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Lower TDP (27W vs 31W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV516
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
27W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy