Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 920A vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 920A vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920A and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 920A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 920A
0.733 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +307%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 900A
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208B
GPU Name
Amethyst
N16V-GM
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
5 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy