Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (91.87GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 102W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 645 OEM
0.894 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +39%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 600
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
957 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
91.87GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
6
SM Count
-
288
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.312 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
37.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
894.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
74.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

102W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy