NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Intel Arc A380

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Intel Arc A380

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)

256 additional rendering cores

Intel Arc A380 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 19% (2050MHz vs 1725MHz)

More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +5%

4.416 TFLOPS

Arc A380

4.198 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +9%

4667

Arc A380

4254

Blender

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +49%

583

Arc A380

389

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +90%

19

Arc A380

10

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +42%

40

Arc A380

28

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +60%

64

Arc A380

40

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

Arc A380

Graphics Card

Nov 2019

Release Date

Jun 2022

GeForce 16

Generation

Alchemist

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz

Base Clock

2000 MHz

1725 MHz

Boost Clock

2050 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1937 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

6GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

96bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

186.0GB/s

Render Config

20

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

1280

Shading Units

1024

80

TMUs

64

32

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

128

-

RT Cores

8

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

1024 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

65.60 GPixel/s

138.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

131.2 GTexel/s

8.832 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

8.397 TFLOPS

4.416 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

4.198 TFLOPS

138.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

DG2-128

TU116-250-KA-A1

GPU Variant

ACM-G11

Turing

Architecture

Generation 12.7

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

6 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

7.2 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

157 mm²

Board Design

100W

TDP

75W

300 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA T400

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD