Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX +1965%
11.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
320bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
3584
72
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy