CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX
+1965%
11.07 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
CMP 50HX
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
320bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
3584
72
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Board Design
171W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1050
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy