CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon HD 7950
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950
+434%
2.867 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
Radeon HD 7950
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
216
Shading Units
1792
72
TMUs
112
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V7900
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V3700
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA PG506 232
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy