Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 +434%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
216
Shading Units
1792
72
TMUs
112
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy