Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs Intel Arc A750

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +3505%
17.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
28
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
DG2-512
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy