Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
16704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +12914%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
132
192
Shading Units
16896
64
TMUs
528
28
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GB100
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
208 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
9.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy