Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +30%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Turks
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy