Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (120W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 +31%
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
G92B
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy