Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900 +28%
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Cayman
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy