Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 84.10GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +388%
2.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2018
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1392 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1518 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
96bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
84.10GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.43 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.43 GFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.332 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GP107
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
GP107-301-K1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy