Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 +282%
1.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GM206
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy