Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +4730%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
40
192
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
160
28
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
AD104
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy