Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +758%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy