CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX
+1463%
11.07 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
VS
CMP 50HX
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
320bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Board Design
204W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
4
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
6
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy