Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +546%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Aug 2015
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
1024
432
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
75W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy