Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +47796%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Oct 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
6144bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
16
432
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

400W
TDP
21W
800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy