Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
6848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +7792%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
768MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
8
6912
Shading Units
64
432
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
12
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

400W
TDP
59W
800 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy