Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
7488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +4139%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
7680
16
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy