Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (62W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000 +47%
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Dec 2010
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
62W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy