Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (45W vs 130W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
-
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G71
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy