Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1550MHz vs 1440MHz)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +333%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Apr 2021
H3C Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
24GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
165W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
54.2 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy