Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

Intel H3C XG310 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Unknown
H3C Graphics
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
2
24
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
VSA-101
-
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
180 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.014 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
15W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy