Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+85%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
144
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
