Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 285W)
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
14064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
RTX 5880 Ada Generation +177515%
69.27 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2024
NVS
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
110
16
Shading Units
14080
8
TMUs
440
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
440
-
RT Cores
110
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
433.0 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1082 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
69.27 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
69.27 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1082 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
285W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD102
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy