Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1440MHz vs 1203MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +318%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2016
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1203 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1024
224
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.50 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.99 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.464 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.99 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GM206S
-
GPU Variant
950 OEM
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy