CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+2972%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
VS
Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
2
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
3
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
4
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
5
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
6
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
7
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
8
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
9
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
10
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA L40G
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy