Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +2972%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy