Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +2843%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
80
192
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GV100
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy