CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 400
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
7632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+12696%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
VS
Arctic Sound 2T
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
7680
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
2
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
4
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
5
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
6
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
7
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10
8
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
9
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
10
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy