Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 51W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D +170%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
51W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK107
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy