Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +5450%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
TU102
N12M-Q3
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy