Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +1244%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
7680
56
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

204W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy