Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC +369%
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
122W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy