Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (23W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX +2100%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
1
192
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
23W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy