Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000M +1918%
1.615 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
1344
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.83 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.31 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.615 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.31 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK104
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
N14E-Q5-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy