Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K510M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 19.20GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K510M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro K510M +326%
0.341 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
19.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.556 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.22 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
341.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
14.22 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK208
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy