Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M +1255%
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK104
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy