Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +76550%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
384
8
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
295W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
Navi 31
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy