Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro Plex 2100 D4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 640W)
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro Plex 2100 D4 +300%
0.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
320.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
G92
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
640W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy