Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
10208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 +42525%
34.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
80
32
Shading Units
10240
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA102
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy