Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 +723%
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
8
32
Shading Units
256
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
142W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GF100
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy