Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile +9934%
17.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
46
64
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
12
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
140W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GA104
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy